User Tools

Site Tools

tactics:stonewalling

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
tactics:stonewalling [2024/09/20 14:21] – [How to Stonewall] Humphrey Boa-Garttactics:stonewalling [2024/09/20 14:31] (current) – [Advanced Stonewalling] Humphrey Boa-Gart
Line 3: Line 3:
 **Stonewalling** is a defensive tactic, wherein one refuses to communicate or cooperate during an interaction. It is a form of deflection that can take many forms, such as giving vague responses, responding to questions with additional questions, or even refusing to talk at all. **Stonewalling** is a defensive tactic, wherein one refuses to communicate or cooperate during an interaction. It is a form of deflection that can take many forms, such as giving vague responses, responding to questions with additional questions, or even refusing to talk at all.
  
-Stonewalling is oftentimes enough to make many basic threats give up and go away. However, it can be used to stall confrontation with more persistent enemies as well. During [[:op|field operations]], you will likely encounter stonewall tactics - especially from [[hazards:astroturf|gatekeepers]], [[hazards:agent-provocateurs|agent provocateurs]], [[hazards:shills]] and [[hazards:cults|cults]].+Stonewalling is oftentimes enough to make many basic threats give up and go away. However, it can be used to stall confrontations with more persistent enemies as well. During [[:op|field operations]], you will likely encounter stonewall tactics - especially from [[hazards:astroturf|gatekeepers]], [[hazards:agent-provocateurs|agent provocateurs]], [[hazards:shills]] and [[hazards:cults|cults]].
  
  
Line 14: Line 14:
 Once you know their intentions //(and it is essential you do not jump to conclusions about their intentions, or your stone wall may be riddled with weak spots)// you can deploy other simple stonewalling tactics. Give them vague explanations. Present your answers in the form of questions of your own. Change the subject to something tangentially related, or even outright irrelevant. Maybe even send them off on a [[hazards:red-herring|wild goose chase]] to get them to leave you alone for awhile and waste their time. Once you know their intentions //(and it is essential you do not jump to conclusions about their intentions, or your stone wall may be riddled with weak spots)// you can deploy other simple stonewalling tactics. Give them vague explanations. Present your answers in the form of questions of your own. Change the subject to something tangentially related, or even outright irrelevant. Maybe even send them off on a [[hazards:red-herring|wild goose chase]] to get them to leave you alone for awhile and waste their time.
  
-If the conversation is in-person, mumble a lot so to make them ask you to repeat yourself over and over. If it is online, use a lot of typos to make yourself harder to read. Worst case scenario, you can even just stop responding //(which is especially effective in chat applications if you have read receipts disabled)//.+Time wasters are a crucial foundation for any stone wall. The longer you can drag things out, the harder it will be for them to continue the interaction as other things in their life will eventually take priority. If the conversation is in-person, mumble a lot so to make them ask you to repeat yourself over and over. If it is online, use a lot of typos to make yourself harder to read. Worst case scenario, you can even just stop responding //(which is especially effective in chat applications if you have read receipts disabled)//.
  
-Many simple-minded enemies you can make go away with those tricks. However, with more determined foes //(such as investigative journalists and [[hazards:law-enforcement|law enforcement]])// they will eventually realize you are just stonewalling them. In those cases, you can just outright [[tactics:dont-say-anything|refuse to comment]], or tell them to go fuck themselves.+Many simple-minded enemies you can make go away with those tricks. However, more determined foes //(such as investigative journalists and [[hazards:law-enforcement|law enforcement]])// will eventually realize you are stonewalling them. In those cases, you can just outright [[tactics:dont-say-anything|refuse to comment]], or tell them to go fuck themselves.
  
  
 ===== Advanced Stonewalling ===== ===== Advanced Stonewalling =====
 +
 +[{{ :tactics:hadrians-wall.jpg |A stone wall is even more effective when multiple people work together to build it.}}]
  
 Stone walls are incredibly versatile structures that can be used for more than simply evading questions or avoiding direct confrontation. For example, it can take the form of **filibustering** to stall the passage of bills in congressional or parliamentary settings. It can also be used in corporate meetings or town halls to waste the minutes away, in order to shut down dissenting opinions. Stone walls are incredibly versatile structures that can be used for more than simply evading questions or avoiding direct confrontation. For example, it can take the form of **filibustering** to stall the passage of bills in congressional or parliamentary settings. It can also be used in corporate meetings or town halls to waste the minutes away, in order to shut down dissenting opinions.
  
-In legal settings, a group of witnesses may agree in advance to stonewall prosecutors or detectives, in order to protect themselves or their friends from prosecution. Politicians may engage in stonewalling during television interviews or debates, which is extremely effective due to limited airtime and the notoriously short attention spans of the average person.+In legal settings, a group of witnesses or defendants may agree in advance to stonewall prosecutors or detectives, in order to protect themselves or their friends from legal retaliation. Politicians may engage in stonewalling during television interviews or debates, which is extremely effective due to limited airtime and the notoriously short attention spans of the average person.
  
 Stonewalling may also be used as a form of **social rejection**, in which a dominant party works together to keep a weaker party ostracized or excommunicated. This is a common [[tactics:demoralization|demoralization]] tactic used by [[hazards:gatekeepers]], since it breeds feelings of inadequacy in the ostracized //(it also serves, again, as a stalling tactic, since simply telling the ostracized they are not allowed to participate will immediately prompt dedicated intruders to finding alternative modes of entry)//. By stonewalling perceived //"undesirables"//, gatekeepers can effectively neutralize threats and postpone any direct confrontations to the status quo. Stonewalling may also be used as a form of **social rejection**, in which a dominant party works together to keep a weaker party ostracized or excommunicated. This is a common [[tactics:demoralization|demoralization]] tactic used by [[hazards:gatekeepers]], since it breeds feelings of inadequacy in the ostracized //(it also serves, again, as a stalling tactic, since simply telling the ostracized they are not allowed to participate will immediately prompt dedicated intruders to finding alternative modes of entry)//. By stonewalling perceived //"undesirables"//, gatekeepers can effectively neutralize threats and postpone any direct confrontations to the status quo.
tactics/stonewalling.1726842060.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/09/20 14:21 by Humphrey Boa-Gart

Find this page online at: https://bestpoint.institute/tactics/stonewalling